← Back to the writing

The Book · Reading copy

Chapter 1 — Born on the Borderline

Manuscript Draft v0.1 · Part I — Where This Started · Bronze · 2 September 2026

I was born in December 1981, in Bloemfontein, in a country that was still eleven years and one impossible transition away from becoming something new.

That date puts me on a line most demographic charts don't quite know what to do with — too late for Gen X, too early to comfortably claim Millennial, sitting on the seam between two labels that were both built for someone else's childhood. I remember typewriters as a real tool, not a novelty. I remember the specific weight of a Sunday afternoon before there was anything to watch on three channels of television. And I remember, just as clearly, learning to navigate a computer, then the internet, then everything that came after it, alongside kids half my age who'd never known a world without a screen in it.

Belonging to neither generation cleanly means you inherit both of their blind spots and neither of their built-in maps.

The year before, in Standard 3, my parents' marriage had already ended. My mother remarried that February; my father would remarry the year after. So by the time I was twelve, in 1994, the tightness I was picking up on wasn't coming from one house anymore — it was coming from two, each newly reshaped, each carrying its own version of adjustment, and neither of them fully explained to a child moving between them.

I was twelve years old in 1994. Old enough to feel that something enormous was happening in the country as well — I could read it in the things adults stopped saying mid-sentence when a child walked into a room, in the particular quality of silence that settles when the grown-ups are frightened and trying not to show it. Old enough to absorb all of that as atmosphere, layered on top of an atmosphere that was already there for reasons that had nothing to do with politics at all.

Too young to have the political language to understand a single thing that was actually happening — in the country, or at home.

That gap — between what a child can feel and what a child has been given the words to understand — is where this whole book actually starts. Not with a political history of a country in transition, though that history matters and I'll tell what I can honestly tell of it. It starts smaller than that. It starts with what it does to a person to spend a childhood sensing that the ground is moving, without anyone ever quite sitting down and explaining which way.

I have a specific memory from around that time — a rumour moving through my school, the way rumours do among children who've picked up just enough adult fear to be dangerous to themselves with it, but not enough adult context to know what to do with it. I won't pretend I remember every detail with total accuracy; memory at twelve is partial by nature, more felt than filed. What I remember clearly is the feeling: that something was coming, that it was serious enough for adults to lower their voices about, and that no one had decided it was my business to understand yet.

Multiply that feeling by every kitchen table conversation cut short, every news bulletin watched by adults with a child pretending not to watch too, every "you're too young to understand" said kindly and meant kindly and still leaving a twelve-year-old alone with a fear he had no framework to place.

That's the borderline. Not a date on a chart. A whole childhood spent one half-step behind the explanation.

There is a second thing that happened around the same time, quieter than the fear, and it took me decades to notice it had happened at all.

Some of the other kids at school seemed to already know things I didn't know I was supposed to know. Not facts — facts I could learn. Something underneath facts. How to ask an adult for help without it costing you something. How to read a room before you spoke in it. How to want something out loud without being told you were being difficult for wanting it.

I used to think that was a personality difference. Some kids were just more confident, more capable, better built for the world as it was. It took me most of my adult life, and a diagnosis that arrived twenty years too late to do anything about the years it would have explained, to understand it differently: some of those kids had someone at home actively translating the world for them, in real time, as it changed. Not because their parents were smarter or loved them more. Because their parents had, themselves, been translated for — had inherited a working map, however imperfect, and had someone to ask when the map ran out.

I didn't have that missing because anyone failed me on purpose. I had it missing because the people around me were doing the exact same thing I was doing: standing in a country and a household and a decade that had all changed shape faster than anyone had been given the tools to explain, and doing their best with instinct where explanation should have been.

That's not a grievance. It's a diagnosis of the actual terrain, and it matters, because a person who thinks they were simply born less capable than the kids who seemed to glide through it will spend a lifetime trying to out-work a deficit that was never really theirs. A person who understands they were born onto harder ground, with a thinner map, can stop measuring themselves against people who started somewhere else, and start doing something more useful: building a better map for whoever comes up that same hill behind them.

I was not less capable.

I was less translated.

That's the whole difference, and it took me until I was in my forties, sitting with the wreckage of a life I'd built entirely out of trying to prove I belonged, to finally see it clearly enough to say.

The word "Standards" disappeared from my school sometime in the mid-1990s, replaced by "Grades." On paper it was a renaming exercise — Standard 5 became Grade 7, Standard 10 became Grade 12, a tidy one-to-one substitution any administrator could explain in a single memo.

It did not feel like a substitution. It felt like the ground had been quietly swapped out from under a building that was still fully occupied.

Teachers who had spent whole careers inside one system were now teaching inside another, sometimes with barely more notice than the students got. Some of them adapted with real grace. Others simply kept teaching the old system in the new system's clothing, and you could feel it — a kind of institutional stutter, an adult authority figure translating in real time, in front of you, and not always successfully. If the people meant to explain the new rules were themselves still learning them, what exactly was a child supposed to do with that? Nod along. Absorb the confusion as if it were your own failure to understand, rather than what it actually was — an entire system mid-sentence, rebuilding itself while still in use.

I struggled with maths for most of that period, and for a long time I filed that struggle under the same heading I filed everything else I didn't understand about myself: not smart enough, not disciplined enough, not paying enough attention. It never once occurred to me, at the time, that the actual subject wasn't only mathematics. It was also: a curriculum in the middle of changing, a teacher doing her honest best inside that change, and a child with an as-yet-unnamed different way of holding information, trying to learn a moving target using instructions that assumed the target was standing still.

That combination doesn't produce a slow learner. It produces a confused one — which looks identical from the outside, and feels completely different from the inside, and nobody in that classroom had the language, in that decade, to tell the two apart.

The first computer I ever used properly belonged to someone else's family, in someone else's house, and I remember the specific, electric strangeness of a screen that could hold and change information instead of just displaying it once and staying that way forever, the way a book or a television did. It felt like a door into something enormous, half-open, humming.

Nobody sat me down and taught me what was behind that door. I learned the way most of my generation learned nearly everything about the machines that would go on to reshape our entire working lives: by trial, by error, by quietly watching someone slightly more confident than me and copying what they did without fully understanding why it worked. That's not a complaint about anyone in particular. There was no one whose job it was to teach an ordinary child how to inhabit a computer, an internet, and eventually an inbox full of tools that could out-think parts of a trade I would one day spend nineteen years learning by hand. The instruction simply didn't exist yet, for anyone, because the thing being taught was still being invented while we were learning it.

That's the shape of the whole borderline, all the way through: not one dramatic rupture, but a long, low hum of arriving after the instructions were supposed to have already been given — political, educational, technological, all three at once, all three without a manual, all three treated by the adults around me as either too small to explain or too large to fully understand themselves.

Somewhere in the middle of all of that, "behind" stopped being something that happened to me occasionally and became something I simply assumed I was. Not a temporary state. An identity. If you had asked twelve-year-old me, or even thirty-year-old me, to describe himself in one honest word, "behind" would have been near the top of the list — behind on maths, behind on computers, behind on understanding a country that kept changing shape, behind on whatever invisible thing the confident kids seemed to already have.

It took decades, a diagnosis, and the total collapse of a career I'd built entirely on trying to out-work that feeling, to finally ask the only question that actually mattered:

Behind whom, exactly? Measured against what map — and who actually had a copy of it?

Field notes: what nobody explained

I was not behind.

I was translating a moving world with no one assigned to translate it for me — and I had mistaken the exhaustion of that work for a verdict on my worth.

That mistake would take another twenty-five years to fully undo. The undoing is most of the rest of this book.